Rhonda Bitting

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is a prevalent symptom among both cancer survivors and older adults. Negative consequences of fatigue include increased sedentary behavior, decreased physical activity and function, and lower quality of life. Few pharmacologic interventions improve fatigue. Our preclinical and clinical data show promising effects of a muscadine grape extract supplement (MGES) on oxidative stress, mitochondrial bioenergetics, the microbiome, and the symptom of fatigue. This pilot study seeks to translate these observations to cancer survivorship by testing the preliminary effect of MGE supplementation on older adult cancer survivors with self-reported fatigue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a double-blinded placebo-controlled pilot study to evaluate preliminary efficacy of MGE supplementation versus placebo on fatigue among older adult cancer survivors (aged ≥65 years) who report baseline fatigue. Sixty-four participants will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to twice daily MGES (four tablets twice daily) versus placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue score from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes are change in self-reported physical function, physical fitness (6-min walk test), self-reported physical activity, global quality of life (QOL), and the Fried frailty index. Correlative biomarker assays will assess changes in 8-hydroxy-2 deoxyguanosine, peripheral blood mitochondrial function, inflammatory markers, and the gut microbiome. DISCUSSION: This pilot study builds on preclinical and clinical observations to estimate effects of MGE supplementation on fatigue, physical function, QOL, and biologic correlates in older adult cancer survivors. Trial registration #: CT.govNCT04495751; IND 152908.

The NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer address staging and risk assessment after a prostate cancer diagnosis and include management options for localized, regional, recurrent, and metastatic disease. The NCCN Prostate Cancer Panel meets annually to reevaluate and update their recommendations based on new clinical data and input from within NCCN Member Institutions and from external entities. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarizes much of the panel's discussions for the 4.2022 and 1.2023 updates to the guidelines regarding systemic therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To examine and compare changes in strength and physical function from pre- to post-diagnosis among men with prostate cancer (PC, [cases]) and matched non-cancer controls identified from the Health, Aging and Body Composition (Health ABC) study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of 2 strength and 3 physical function-based measures among both cases and controls, identified from a large cohort of community living older adults enrolled in the Health ABC study. We plotted trajectories for each measure and compared cases vs. controls from the point of diagnosis onwards using mixed-effects regression models. For cases only, we examined predictors of poor strength or physical function. RESULTS: We identified 117 PC cases and 453 matched non-cancer controls (50% African Americans). At baseline, there were no differences between cases and controls in demographic factors, comorbidities or self-reported physical function; however, cases had slightly better grip strength (44.6 kg vs. 41.0 kg, p<0.01), quadriceps strength (360.5 Nm vs. 338.7 Nm, p = 0.02) and Health ABC physical performance battery scores (2.4 vs. 2.3, p = 0.01). All men experienced similar declines in strength and physical function over an equivalent amount of time. The loss of quad strength was most notable, with losses of nearly two-thirds of baseline strength over approximately 7 years of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Among both cases and controls, strength and physical function decline with increasing age. The largest declines were seen in lower body strength. Regular assessments should guide lifestyle interventions that can offset age- and treatment-related declines among men with PC.

BACKGROUND: Moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT) is an accepted treatment for localized prostate cancer; however, limited MHRT data address high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) and/or African American patients. We report clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles for individuals with HRPC treated in an equal access system. METHODS: We identified patients with HRPC treated with MHRT at a US Department of Veterans Affairs referral center. Exclusion criteria included < 12 months follow-up and elective nodal irradiation. MHRT included 70 Gy over 28 fractions or 60 Gy over 20 fractions. Acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Clinical endpoints, including biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Clinical outcomes, acute toxicity, and late toxicity-free survival were compared between African American and White patients with logistic regression and log-rank testing. RESULTS: Between November 2008 and August 2018, 143 patients with HRPC were treated with MHRT and followed for a median of 38.5 months; 82 (57%) were African American and 61 were White patients. Concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was provided for 138 (97%) patients for a median duration of 24 months. No significant differences between African American and White patients were observed for 5-year OS (73% [95% CI, 58%-83%] vs 77% [95% CI, 60%-97%]; P = .55), PCSS (90% [95% CI, 79%-95%] vs 87% [95 % CI, 70%-95%]; P = .57), DMFS (91% [95% CI, 80%-96%] vs 81% [95% CI, 62%-91%]; P = .55), or BRFS (83% [95% CI, 70%-91%] vs 71% [95% CI, 53%-82%]; P = .57), respectively. Rates of acute grade 3+ GU and GI were low overall (4% and 1%, respectively). Late toxicities were similarly favorable with no significant differences by race. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with HRPC treated with MHRT in an equal access setting demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes that did not differ by race, alongside acceptable rates of acute and late toxicities.