Noah Kauff

High-grade serous carcinomas of the uterine adnexa with BRCA1 deficiency (high-grade serous carcinomas-BRCA) have recently been described to demonstrate characteristic histopathological features. We hypothesize that metastatic high-grade serous carcinomas-BRCA cases exhibit characteristic morphological features as well. We studied 102 high-grade serous carcinomas with known BRCA1 and BRCA2 genotype from the archives of the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. The primary site morphological characteristics of these cases were reported previously; we now focus solely on tumor morphology in sites other than the uterine adnexa (ie, metastatic sites). The study group consisted of the following case types: 13 BRCA1 germline mutations; 5 BRCA1 somatic mutations; 10 BRCA1 promoter methylation; 4 BRCA2 germline mutations; 1 BRCA2 somatic mutation; 11 lacking BRCA1 or BRCA2 abnormality; 58 cases lacking BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation. Two observers independently scored invasion patterns and microscopic tumor architecture while blinded to genotype. Concordance between observers and correlations between metastatic patterns and the following indices were studied: genotype, primary site tumor characteristics, and BRCA1 immunohistochemistry. Concordance between observers was excellent (κ values >0.9). All cases with BRCA1 or 2 abnormalities showed either pushing pattern metastases (76%) or infiltrative metastases composed only of micropapillae (24%). In contrast, all cases lacking BRCA1 or 2 abnormalities showed infiltrative metastases that contained combinations of papillary, glandular, and, rarely, cribriform and micropapillary architecture (P<0.0001 for comparison with pushing metastasis and P<0.001 for comparison with purely micropapillary architecture). Morphological assessment of metastatic carcinomas, a highly reproducible exercise, accurately correlated with BRCA1 status in every case, unlike morphological assessment of primary site adnexal high-grade serous carcinomas or BRCA1 immunohistochemistry. Metastatic high-grade serous carcinomas-BRCAs exhibit characteristic morphological features that appear more sensitive and specific for BRCA mutations than two other morphologically based prediction systems and should be easier to apply in practice. These findings should be validated prospectively in an independent cohort.

BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the BRCA2 cancer susceptibility gene are associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (PC). Breast-pancreas cancer families with BRCA1 mutations have also been observed. The influence of a family history (FH) of PC on BRCA mutation prevalence in patients with breast cancer (BC) is unknown. METHODS: A clinical database review (2000-2009) identified 211 Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) BC probands who 1) underwent BRCA1/2 mutation analysis by full gene sequencing or directed testing for Ashkenazi founder mutations (BRCA1: 185delAG and 5382insC; BRCA2: 6174delT) and 2) had a FH of PC in a first-, second-, or third-degree relative. For each proband, the pretest probability of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation was estimated using the Myriad II model. The observed-to-expected (O:E) mutation prevalence was calculated for the entire group. RESULTS: Of the 211 AJ BC probands with a FH of PC, 30 (14.2%) harbored a BRCA mutation. Fourteen (47%) of the mutations were in BRCA1 and 16 (53%) were in BRCA2. Patients diagnosed with BC at age ≤ 50 years were found to have a higher BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence than probands with BC who were diagnosed at age > 50 years (21.1% vs 6.9%; P = .003). In patients with a first-, second-, or third-degree relative with PC, mutation prevalences were 15.4%, 15.3%, and 8.6%, respectively (P = .58). In the overall group, the observed BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence was 14.2% versus an expected prevalence of 11.8% (O:E ratio, 1.21; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are observed with nearly equal distribution in AJ breast-pancreas cancer families, suggesting that both genes are associated with PC risk. In this population, a FH of PC was found to have a limited effect on mutation prevalence.

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in family members of individuals with known deleterious mutations can distinguish between patients at high risk of disease and those who are not. Some studies have suggested that individuals testing negative for known familial mutations (true negatives), may still have a higher risk of breast cancer (BC) than the general population. We have examined a prospectively followed cohort of true negative women in the US. Subjects were close relatives of known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who had undergone genetic testing, were negative for the known familial mutation, and were unaffected at the time of genetic testing. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using SEER incidence rates. Among 375 true negatives, two invasive and two in situ BC and no ovarian cancers were diagnosed with mean follow up of 4.9 years (total of 1,962 person years).Four invasive BC were expected, whereas two were observed, for an age-adjusted SIR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.13-2.09). We observed more cases of in situ BC (n = 2) than were expected (n = 0.9; SIR = 2.30; 95% CI 0.57-9.19).There were no cases of ovarian cancer observed; 0.4 case was expected. In this prospective study of women who were unaffected at the time of genetic testing and who were negative for the known familial mutation in BRCA1/2, no excess risk of invasive BC was observed. Our data suggest that such women in the US should adhere to population based guidelines for breast cancer screening.

Identification of the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinoma is important given that such tumors are the most common noncolorectal tumors to occur in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome, and may bear prognostic relevance. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC), a simple and fast technique, in detecting MSI in endometrial carcinoma. The study subjects consisted of 90 endometrial carcinoma patients with equal representation of MSI-high (MSI-H) and non-MSI-H tumors. MSI was tested using the standard polymerase chain reaction-based method and the 5 NCI-recommended markers. Overall, IHC with MLH1 and MSH2 antibodies detected 69% of MSI-H tumors with a specificity of 100%. Adding PMS2 and MSH6 to the antibody panel increased the sensitivity to 91% but decreased the specificity to 83%. The most common IHC abnormality in MSI tumors was concurrent loss of MLH1/PMS2. Assessment of staining was straightforward in most cases but not in all. Staining inadequacies existed. Five stains (4 MLH1 and 1 MSH6) were not interpretable because of the lack of any internal positive control. Two percent to 10% of the cases (depending on the antibody assessed) had only focal weak staining; the highest frequency (10%) occurred with MLH1 antibody. PMS2 staining detected 7 MLH1-staining present MSI-H cases, thus partly accounting for the increased sensitivity with the 4-antibody panel. MSH6 staining identified 9 cases with loss of MSH6 alone, 6 of 9 were non-MSI-H, thus partly accounting for the decreased specificity with the 4-antibody panel. In conclusion, our results suggest that IHC is useful in detecting MSI in endometrial carcinoma. Although IHC has a lower sensitivity with more apparent staining inadequacies in detecting MSI in endometrial carcinoma than it does in colorectal carcinoma, its use in endometrial carcinoma may be an important adjunct when screening for hereditary cases. In the future, as prognostic and therapeutic implications of MSI phenotype become better defined, it may be reasonable to perform IHC for mismatch repair proteins in large numbers of endometrial carcinomas.