Nicole Larrier
Overview:
Pediatric Malignancies
Sarcomas and tumors of the bone
Vice Chair of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion for Duke Radiation Oncology
Sarcomas and tumors of the bone
Vice Chair of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion for Duke Radiation Oncology
Positions:
Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology
School of Medicine
Member of the Duke Cancer Institute
Duke Cancer Institute
School of Medicine
Education:
B.S. 1994
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.S. 1995
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.D. 1999
Johns Hopkins University
Intern, Internal Medicine
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Resident, Radiation Oncology
Duke University
Publications:
An Analysis of Major Target Deviations in Craniospinal Irradiation Treatment Plans for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Medulloblastoma Within a Phase 3 Clinical Trial (Children's Oncology Group Study ACNS0331).
PURPOSE: Craniospinal irradiation remains an essential and yet difficult part of the treatment of patients with medulloblastoma. Whereas technological advances offer promise of increased conformity, realiance on advanced technology is not without risk, and it remains critical to carefully delineate targets. We describe examples of target deviations (TDs) in craniospinal irradiation treatment plans for postoperative patients with medulloblastoma in a phase 3 clinical trial (ACNS 0331). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The principal investigator independently performed a review of the treatment plans and portal films of enrolled patients and evaluated the plans for TDs. TDs of dose, dose uniformity, and volume were defined as major or minor deviations. Major TDs scored as protocol violations. The effect of major TDs on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 549 patients enrolled, 461 were available for this analysis. Thirty-two (7%) plans did not have data sufficient for TD evaluation. Major TDs were found in 32 of the 461 plans (7%). Of those, 21 were deviations of target volume alone, 7 were deviations of target dose alone, and 4 were deviations of both target volume and dose. The 25 patients with TDs of volume involved 29 sites. The most common major TDs of volume involved the brain (9 of 29) and the posterior fossa (9 of 29). On Cox proportional hazards modeling, the presence of a major TD did not statistically significantly affect EFS (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-2.11; P = .9541) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-2.38; P = .8113). CONCLUSIONS: Although intensity modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy are promising in improving conformity and sparing organs at risk, technology does not substitute for careful anatomic definition of target volumes. The study was not powered to evaluate the effect of TDs on EFS and OS; therefore, the statistical analysis presented in this study must be interpreted with caution.
Authors
Schiff, JP; Lee, Y; Wang, Y; Perkins, SM; Kessel, SK; Fitzgerald, TJ; Larrier, NA; Michalski, JM
MLA Citation
Schiff, Joshua P., et al. “An Analysis of Major Target Deviations in Craniospinal Irradiation Treatment Plans for Patients With Intermediate-Risk Medulloblastoma Within a Phase 3 Clinical Trial (Children's Oncology Group Study ACNS0331).” Adv Radiat Oncol, vol. 8, no. 1, 2023, p. 101083. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.adro.2022.101083.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1555632
PMID
36483060
Source
pubmed
Published In
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Volume
8
Published Date
Start Page
101083
DOI
10.1016/j.adro.2022.101083
What radiation dose is safe in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer?
Authors
MLA Citation
Larrier, Nicole A., and Lawrence B. Marks. “What radiation dose is safe in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer?” Nat Clin Pract Oncol, vol. 4, no. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 80–81. Pubmed, doi:10.1038/ncponc0689.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub782637
PMID
17228308
Source
pubmed
Published In
Nat Clin Pract Oncol
Volume
4
Published Date
Start Page
80
End Page
81
DOI
10.1038/ncponc0689
Genitourinary
Authors
MLA Citation
Larrier, N. Genitourinary. Sept. 2015, pp. 283–96. Scopus, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16435-9_15.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1165933
Source
scopus
Published Date
Start Page
283
End Page
296
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-16435-9_15
Intra-abdominal desmoid tumor after successful treatment for Hodgkin disease.
The risk of second malignancies after successful treatment for Hodgkin disease can be considerable. The most common malignancies are solid tumors arising in irradiated sites, such as the breast and thyroid gland after mantle field radiation. Sarcomas and other musculoskeletal tumors are also seen. We describe a young woman who developed an intra-abdominal desmoid tumor more than 4 years after completing therapy for Stage IIB Hodgkin disease, treated with combination chemotherapy (ABVD) and mantle irradiation. The tumor did not occur at either a surgical site or within a radiation field. She did not carry a mutation for familial adenomatosis polypoli.
Authors
Rosoff, PM; Larrier, N; Rice, HE
MLA Citation
Rosoff, Philip M., et al. “Intra-abdominal desmoid tumor after successful treatment for Hodgkin disease.” Pediatr Blood Cancer, vol. 45, no. 5, Oct. 2005, pp. 728–31. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/pbc.20288.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub675579
PMID
16035093
Source
pubmed
Published In
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Volume
45
Published Date
Start Page
728
End Page
731
DOI
10.1002/pbc.20288
Extent of tumor fibrosis/hyalinization and infarction following neoadjuvant radiation therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.
INTRODUCTION: Current standard of care for most intermediate and high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) includes limb-preserving surgical resection with either neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NRT) or adjuvant radiation therapy. To date, there have been a few studies that attempt to correlate histopathologic response to NRT with oncologic outcomes in patients with STS. METHODS: Using our institutional database, we identified 58 patients who received NRT followed by surgical resection for primary intermediate or high-grade STS and 34 patients who received surgical resection without NRT but did receive adjuvant radiation therapy or did not receive any radiation therapy. We analyzed four histologic parameters of response to therapy: residual viable tumor, fibrosis/hyalinization, necrosis, and infarction (each ratiometrically determined). Data were stratified into two binary groups. Unadjusted, 5- and 10-year overall survival, and relapsed-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Analysis of pathologic characteristics showed that patients treated with NRT demonstrate significantly higher tumor infarction, higher tumor fibrosis/hyalinization, and a lower percent viable tumor compared with patients not treated with NRT (p < 0.0001). Based on Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and multivariate cox proportional hazard model for OS and RFS, patients treated with NRT and showing >12.5% tumor fibrosis/hyalinization have significantly higher overall survival and recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We have identified three histopathologic characteristics-fibrosis, hyalinization, and infarction-that may serve as predictive biomarkers of response to NRT for STS patients. Future prospective studies will be needed to confirm this association.
Authors
Rao, SR; Lazarides, AL; Leckey, BL; Lane, WO; Visgauss, JD; Somarelli, JA; Kirsch, DG; Larrier, NA; Brigman, BE; Blazer, DG; Cardona, DM; Eward, WC
MLA Citation
Rao, Sneha R., et al. “Extent of tumor fibrosis/hyalinization and infarction following neoadjuvant radiation therapy is associated with improved survival in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.” Cancer Med, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 194–206. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/cam4.4428.
URI
https://scholars.duke.edu/individual/pub1502547
PMID
34837341
Source
pubmed
Published In
Cancer Medicine
Volume
11
Published Date
Start Page
194
End Page
206
DOI
10.1002/cam4.4428

Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology
Contact:
201 Trent Drive, Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710
Department of Radiation Oncolo, Box 3085, Durham, NC 27710