From the Duke Cancer Institute archives. Content may be out of date.
Walks in the park, a stress-relieving game of fetch, affectionate belly rubs. “Man’s best friend” brings us all that and more.
But, in the case of bone cancer (osteosarcoma), dogs are proving, again, that they can benefit their humans’ lives in a substantial way. Duke orthopedic oncologist Will Eward, MD, DVM, and colleagues are investigating how this link could improve health outcomes for children stricken by this disease.
The Case for Osteosarcoma and Dogs
Duke oncologist and veterinarian Will Eward with veterinary oncologist Steven Suter and cancer patient Deuce.
Osteosarcoma rarely occurs in humans, accounting for less than one percent of all diagnosed cancers. However, when it appears, it impacts children most heavily as the third most commonly occurring pediatric cancer after lymphoma and brain cancer.
Treating it is difficult, though, because there’s been lack of therapeutic advancements. “With osteosarcoma, I’m telling parents exactly what was told to them in the 1980s,” Eward said. “We can’t keep driving the 1984 Datsun forever. We have to do better because pediatric oncology occupies a special place in medicine. Kids shouldn’t get cancer.”
The small number of children developing osteosarcoma has been a barrier to improving care. That’s where dogs come in, he says. Veterinarians diagnose roughly 4 million dogs with cancer annually, and osteosarcoma accounts for approximately 15 percent of those cases. Not only are most of their tumors identical to those in humans, but their immune systems are also similar, and they share the same food, air, and water exposures. Additionally, the natural survival time for a dog with osteosarcoma is approximately 18 months, making it quicker to find out if treatments prolong life.
To test the viability of new drugs, Eward is partnering, via the Consortium for Canine Comparative Oncology, with veterinary oncologist, Steven Suter, VMD, PhD, medical director of North Carolina State College of Veterinary Medicine’s canine/feline molecular oncology diagnostic lab. Through a canine clinical trial, funded by a $250,000 grant from Hyundai Hope on Wheels to specifically target links between canine and human sarcomas, they are investigating whether two existing medications can combat osteosarcoma in dogs, potentially opening the door for use with children.
“These are dogs that just happen to get osteosarcoma like we do,” Eward says. “This is a clinical trial for dogs just like it would be for humans. Their owners have asked for their pets that have osteosarcoma to be included, and we’re treating them the same as we would in a human clinical trial even though that group has two legs and this group has four legs and wags their tails.”
Testing Therapies
A drawing of a low-density lipoprotein--a naturally produced substance in the body that cancers eat. Duke engineer David Needham used nanotechnology to encapsulate an existing drug into a tiny particle that mimics low-density lipoprotein.
The clinical trials test two existing medications approved for other uses—bortezomib and niclosamide. The team designed these trials based on predictive work conducted in mice.
Using immunosuppressed mice, researchers Jason Somarelli, PhD, and David Hsu, MD, PhD, created dog avatars, called xenografts, by injecting cells from dog tumors into the mice to prompt tumor growth. Doing so allowed researchers to more quickly see the drug’s effect.
“Using these xenografts, we demonstrated on a small scale that the drugs could work and could be scaled up for use from a 30-gram mouse to a 150-pound dog,” Somarelli says.
“This type of collaboration between bench science and veterinarians is critical because you can reach discovery much faster and at less cost. We haven’t spent time or millions of dollars going down the rabbit hole," he adds.
In the first trial, after seeing strong efficacy with the xenografts, the team examined how well bortezomib, a drug used to treat multiple myeloma cancer in humans, would work in dogs. While other chemotherapy agents attack cells indiscriminately, causing toxic side effects, bortezomib avoids those responses by only targeting how the cancer packages proteins. Consequently, this trial enrolled 10 dogs who received standard amputation but whose owners did not want to pursue subsequent chemotherapy.
Despite high expectations, Suter says, bortezomib has performed poorly, introducing neurological side effects, such as limb weakness and an inability for the dogs to walk. In addition, the dogs who received the drug didn’t fare any better than those who received standard chemotherapy. While it’s disappointing that bortezomib doesn’t work as anticipated, Eward says, the trial results are still critical.
“If we’ve found that bortezomib has no role for treating osteosarcoma, we’ve figured that out by treating 10 dogs for $90,000 in one year rather than treating five to 10 children in a trial that cost over $1 million,” he said. “We’ve saved doctors from using something that’s not effective.”
The second trial is focused on niclosamide, a drug traditionally used to treat intestinal parasites. Although existing evidence revealed it had some efficacy against osteosarcoma, as an oral drug, it wasn’t a viable treatment option because it can’t dissolve in the blood to reach the tumors. So David Needham, Ph.D., Duke professor of mechanical engineering and material science, created a version of niclosamide that could be intravenously administered, called niclosamide stearate pro-drug therapeutic (NSPT). He used nanotechnology to encapsulate niclosamide into a particle that mimics low-density lipoprotein (a naturally produced substance in the body that cancers eat).
Ten enrolled dogs have received amputation, four standard chemotherapy treatments, and four doses of the modified niclosamide.
To date, Suter says, the results have been promising, with no organ toxicity, no neurological impacts, and only some allergic reactions that can be treated with antihistamines.
The Importance of Collaboration
Researchers Jason Somarelli, PhD, and So Young Kim, PhD.
Ultimately, Eward says, the partnership between Duke and N.C. State has been crucial in moving osteosarcoma research forward. In emerging from their individual silos, bench scientists, oncologists, and veterinarians are charting new territory in cancer treatment. Much work still needs to be done in determining how NSPT kills cancer, providing the therapy to more dogs, and testing NSPT in other solid tumors, but it is clear the potential exists for this drug to combat additional cancers, including breast, prostate, and pancreatic.
“This is kind of like A Tale of Two Cities, only it’s a tale of two drugs,” Eward says. “We had two promising therapies based on the results of mice trials, and now we’re putting effort into moving NSPT to the next step to, one day, be available to humans with this disease.”
A team at the Duke Cancer Institute (DCI) is launching a first-of-its-kind study that could bring new hope to patients living with advanced colorectal cancer.Led by medical student Cheryl Chang and DCI medical oncologist Nicholas DeVito, MD, the project explores why some colorectal cancers that spread to the liver respond well to chemotherapy while others do not. The team recently presented this research at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Immuno-Oncology (IO) Conference.This type of cancer can be especially challenging to treat. Patients often face fewer effective options, and outcomes can vary widely. By taking a closer look at what’s happening inside the tumor before and after treatment, the Duke team hopes to uncover clues that could one day guide more personalized and more effective care.When colorectal cancer spreads to the liver at the time of diagnosis, it often means a tougher road ahead. Doctors know that these patients typically do not respond to chemotherapy the same way others do, but the reasons behind that difference remain unclear.“If we can understand why some patients don’t respond well, we may be able to adjust treatment earlier, or develop new options altogether,” Chang said.To do this, the team is studying tissue samples taken from patients before treatment, when the cancer is first discovered, and after about six months of chemotherapy, when surgeons remove part of the liver or colon.Looking at these pairs of samples gives researchers a rare opportunity to see how cancer and the immune system around it changes during treatment.This is the first known study to compare liver metastasis samples before and after chemotherapy in this specific patient group. Despite decades of using chemotherapy to treat colorectal cancer, surprisingly little is known about how treatment affects the immune environment inside these tumors.“This is an area that’s been largely unexplored,” DeVito said. “We’re excited to contribute something new that has the potential to change how we approach treatment.”A big focus of the study is the tumor microenvironment, the community of immune cells, cancer cells, and other structures within and around each tumor. Using two advanced technologies, the team examines the tumor at both the protein and RNA levels.Working with John Hickey, PhD, assistant professor of biomedical engineering at the Pratt School of Engineering, the team employed the Codex assay in the study. By using special antibodies to highlight different cell types, the assay lets researchers map where various immune cells are and how close they are to the tumor.The team also partnered with Erika Crosby, PhD, assistant professor in the Duke Department of Surgery, to use the Xenium assay, which analyzes the RNA within cells. This helps confirm the protein‑level findings while revealing additional details that might not show up at the protein stage.Early results show meaningful differences between patients who respond to chemotherapy and those who don’t. Some immune cells appear in higher numbers in people who respond well, suggesting these may serve as early indicators of how effective chemotherapy might be.“Without this collaboration between surgery and biomedical engineering, locating and reviewing patient records and samples would have been far more time‑consuming,” DeVito said. “Everything came together at the right time: the technology, the expertise, and access to the right samples. That’s what makes a project like this possible.”A major boost for this work also came from CRUSH Colorectal Cancer, which supports early‑stage ideas that need initial funding before they can compete for larger grants.“CRUSH provided the seed funding that allowed us to get started,” DeVito said. “An added benefit is that any data generated becomes a shared resource for the entire GI oncology team at Duke.”Looking ahead, the team plans to expand their research into mouse models in collaboration with Jatin Roper, MD, that mimic how colorectal cancer spreads to the liver. This could help them test the biomarkers they discover and explore new treatment strategies in the lab.“Ultimately, everything we’re doing comes back to the patient,” Chang said. “We want to find better ways to treat this cancer, especially for patients who don’t have many options today.”The annual CRUSH Colorectal Cancer 5K will be held on March 14. Learn more about the event.
A team at the Duke Cancer Institute (DCI) is launching a first-of-its-kind study that could bring new hope to patients living with advanced colorectal cancer.Led by medical student Cheryl Chang and DCI medical oncologist Nicholas DeVito, MD, the project explores why some colorectal cancers that spread to the liver respond well to chemotherapy while others do not. The team recently presented this research at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Immuno-Oncology (IO) Conference.This type of cancer can be especially challenging to treat. Patients often face fewer effective options, and outcomes can vary widely. By taking a closer look at what’s happening inside the tumor before and after treatment, the Duke team hopes to uncover clues that could one day guide more personalized and more effective care.When colorectal cancer spreads to the liver at the time of diagnosis, it often means a tougher road ahead. Doctors know that these patients typically do not respond to chemotherapy the same way others do, but the reasons behind that difference remain unclear.“If we can understand why some patients don’t respond well, we may be able to adjust treatment earlier, or develop new options altogether,” Chang said.To do this, the team is studying tissue samples taken from patients before treatment, when the cancer is first discovered, and after about six months of chemotherapy, when surgeons remove part of the liver or colon.Looking at these pairs of samples gives researchers a rare opportunity to see how cancer and the immune system around it changes during treatment.This is the first known study to compare liver metastasis samples before and after chemotherapy in this specific patient group. Despite decades of using chemotherapy to treat colorectal cancer, surprisingly little is known about how treatment affects the immune environment inside these tumors.“This is an area that’s been largely unexplored,” DeVito said. “We’re excited to contribute something new that has the potential to change how we approach treatment.”A big focus of the study is the tumor microenvironment, the community of immune cells, cancer cells, and other structures within and around each tumor. Using two advanced technologies, the team examines the tumor at both the protein and RNA levels.Working with John Hickey, PhD, assistant professor of biomedical engineering at the Pratt School of Engineering, the team employed the Codex assay in the study. By using special antibodies to highlight different cell types, the assay lets researchers map where various immune cells are and how close they are to the tumor.The team also partnered with Erika Crosby, PhD, assistant professor in the Duke Department of Surgery, to use the Xenium assay, which analyzes the RNA within cells. This helps confirm the protein‑level findings while revealing additional details that might not show up at the protein stage.Early results show meaningful differences between patients who respond to chemotherapy and those who don’t. Some immune cells appear in higher numbers in people who respond well, suggesting these may serve as early indicators of how effective chemotherapy might be.“Without this collaboration between surgery and biomedical engineering, locating and reviewing patient records and samples would have been far more time‑consuming,” DeVito said. “Everything came together at the right time: the technology, the expertise, and access to the right samples. That’s what makes a project like this possible.”A major boost for this work also came from CRUSH Colorectal Cancer, which supports early‑stage ideas that need initial funding before they can compete for larger grants.“CRUSH provided the seed funding that allowed us to get started,” DeVito said. “An added benefit is that any data generated becomes a shared resource for the entire GI oncology team at Duke.”Looking ahead, the team plans to expand their research into mouse models in collaboration with Jatin Roper, MD, that mimic how colorectal cancer spreads to the liver. This could help them test the biomarkers they discover and explore new treatment strategies in the lab.“Ultimately, everything we’re doing comes back to the patient,” Chang said. “We want to find better ways to treat this cancer, especially for patients who don’t have many options today.”The annual CRUSH Colorectal Cancer 5K will be held on March 14. Learn more about the event.